Atlantic Mackerel

Scomber scombrus

This species is wild-caught.

Summary

Atlantic Mackerel are fast swimmers found throughout the Atlantic Ocean that mature within 3 years. In U.S. waters, Atlantic Mackerel have rebounded from being overfished in the 1970s and are at a high level of abundance. Europeans target separate populations of Atlantic Mackerel, and both fisheries primarily use mid-water trawls, but also bottom trawls. Bycatch of marine mammals continues to be a problem in this otherwise healthy fishery.

Criterion Points
Life History 3.25
Abundance 3.00
Habitat Quality and Fishing Gear Impacts 3.50
Management 3.00
Bycatch 1.25
Final Score (average of criteria) 2.80
Color
Final Score Color
2.60 - 4.00
2.20 - 2.59
1.80 - 2.19
1.40 - 1.79
0.00 - 1.39

Last updated November 29, 2004.

Life History

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

If a value for intrinsic rate of increase (‘r’) is known, assign the score below based on this value. If no r-value is available, assign the score below for the correct age at 50% maturity for females if specified, or for the correct value of growth rate ('k'). If no estimates of r, age at 50% maturity, or k are available, assign the score below based on maximum age.

1.00
Intrinsic rate of increase <0.05; OR age at 50% maturity >10 years; OR growth rate <0.15; OR maximum age >30 years.
2.00
Intrinsic rate of increase = 0.05-0.15; OR age at 50% maturity = 5-10 years; OR a growth rate = 0.16–0.30; OR maximum age = 11-30 years.
3.00
Intrinsic rate of increase >0.16; OR age at 50% maturity = 1-5 years; OR growth rate >0.30; OR maximum age <11 years.

Intrinsic rate of increase is unknown. Atlantic Mackerel mature by age 3, with 50% of the population maturing by age 2. Maximum age observed is 17 years (MAFMC 2003).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
Species has special behaviors that make it especially vulnerable to fishing pressure (e.g., spawning aggregations; site fidelity; segregation by sex; migratory bottlenecks; unusual attraction to gear; etc.).
-0.25
Species has a strategy for sexual development that makes it especially vulnerable to fishing pressure (e.g., age at 50% maturity >20 years; sequential hermaphrodites; extremely low fecundity).
-0.25
Species has a small or restricted range (e.g., endemism; numerous evolutionarily significant units; restricted to one coastline; e.g., American lobster; striped bass; endemic reef fishes).
-0.25
Species exhibits high natural population variability driven by broad–scale environmental change (e.g., El Nino; decadal oscillations).
+0.25
Species does not have special behaviors that increase ease or population consequences of capture OR has special behaviors that make it less vulnerable to fishing pressure (e.g., species is widely dispersed during spawning).
+0.25
Species has a strategy for sexual development that makes it especially resilient to fishing pressure (e.g., age at 50% maturity <1 year; extremely high fecundity).
+0.25
Species is distributed over a very wide range (e.g., throughout an entire hemisphere or ocean basin; e.g., swordfish; tuna; Patagonian toothfish).

Atlantic Mackerel are found in the western Atlantic Cape Lookout, NC. to the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the east coast of Newfoundland. They also occur in the eastern Atlantic, including the Baltic, Mediterranean, and Black Seas (DFO 2002; FAO 11/19/2004).

+0.25
Species does not exhibit high natural population variability driven by broad-scale environmental change (e.g., El Nino; decadal oscillations).
3.25
Points for Life History

Abundance

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Compared to natural or un-fished level, the species population is:

1.00
Low: Abundance or biomass is <75% of BMSY or similar proxy (e.g., spawning potential ratio).
2.00
Medium: Abundance or biomass is 75–125% of BMSY or similar proxy; OR population is approaching or recovering from an overfished condition; OR adequate information on abundance or biomass is not available.
3.00
High: Abundance or biomass is >125% of BMSY or similar proxy.

Atlantic Mackerel in European waters are depleted or harvested outside of safe biological limits (NEAFC 2003). In U.S. waters, however, the Atlantic Mackerel population currently at a high level of abundance, having rebounded from being overfished in the 1970s. When last assessed in 2000, managers estimated Atlantic Mackerel abundance to be 2.1 million metric tons (mt), which is more than twice the Bmsy of 890,000 mt (MAFMC 2003; NEFSC 2000). Data gathered by the Northeast Fisheries Science Center's annual trawl survey indicate that Atlantic Mackerel continue to be at a high level of abundance in U.S. waters (Seagraves, pers. comm., 11/4/04).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
The population is declining over a generational time scale (as indicated by biomass estimates or standardized CPUE).
-0.25
Age, size or sex distribution is skewed relative to the natural condition (e.g., truncated size/age structure or anomalous sex distribution).
-0.25
Species is listed as “overfished” OR species is listed as “depleted”, “endangered”, or “threatened” by recognized national or international bodies.

This species is not currently overfished (MAFMC 2003).

-0.25
Current levels of abundance are likely to jeopardize the availability of food for other species or cause substantial change in the structure of the associated food web.
+0.25
The population is increasing over a generational time scale (as indicated by biomass estimates or standardized CPUE).

The Atlantic Mackerel population has increased since the 1970s (MAFMC 2003). Managers have not conducted a population assessment, however, since 2000 (NEFSC 2000). We, therefore, chose not to award points until a new assessment of Atlantic Mackerel is conducted.

+0.25
Age, size or sex distribution is functionally normal.

Until a new assessment is released, we cannot determine whether the age, size, or sex distribution of the Atlantic Mackerel population in U.S. waters is functionally normal.

+0.25
Species is close to virgin biomass.
+0.25
Current levels of abundance provide adequate food for other predators or are not known to affect the structure of the associated food web.
3.00
Points for Abundance

Habitat Quality and Fishing Gear Impacts

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Select the option that most accurately describes the effect of the fishing method upon the habitat that it affects.

1.00
The fishing method causes great damage to physical and biogenic habitats (e.g., cyanide; blasting; bottom trawling; dredging).
2.00
The fishing method does moderate damage to physical and biogenic habitats (e.g., bottom gillnets; traps and pots; bottom longlines).
3.00
The fishing method does little damage to physical or biogenic habitats (e.g., hand picking; hand raking; hook and line; pelagic long lines; mid-water trawl or gillnet; purse seines).

Mid-water and bottom otter trawls land Atlantic Mackerel. Atlantic Mackerel are targeted by mid-water trawl fisheries and captured incidentally in benthic trawl fisheries for groundfish. In 2002, mid-water trawls landed 83% and bottom otter trawls landed 15% of the Atlantic Mackerel catch (MAFMC 2003). We awarded 3.00 points here because only mid-water trawling operations target Atlantic Mackerel, and benthic trawls land a relatively small proportion of the catch.

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
Habitat for this species is so compromised from non-fishery impacts that the ability of the habitat to support this species is substantially reduced (e.g., dams; pollution; coastal development).
-0.25
Critical habitat areas (e.g., spawning areas) for this species are not protected by management using time/area closures, marine reserves, etc.

Designated essential fish habitat (EFH) areas of Atlantic Mackerel are not protected by management. Since the EFH is largely pelagic, however, other fisheries do not generally affect it (Seagraves, pers. comm., 11/4/2004). We chose not to subtract points because Atlantic Mackerel's EFH is not threatened.

-0.25
No efforts are being made to minimize damage from existing gear types OR new or modified gear is increasing habitat damage (e.g., fitting trawls with roller rigs or rockhopping gear; more robust gear for deep-sea fisheries).
-0.25
If gear impacts are substantial, resilience of affected habitats is very slow (e.g., deep water corals; rocky bottoms).
+0.25
Habitat for this species remains robust and viable and is capable of supporting this species.

There is no reason to suspect that the pelagic habitat of Atlantic Mackerel is not robust, since the population is at a high level of abundance.

+0.25
Critical habitat areas (e.g., spawning areas) for this species are protected by management using time/area closures, marine reserves, etc.
+0.25
Gear innovations are being implemented over a majority of the fishing area to minimize damage from gear types OR no innovations necessary because gear effects are minimal.
+0.25
If gear impacts are substantial, resilience of affected habitats is fast (e.g., mud or sandy bottoms) OR gear effects are minimal.

Benthic trawling operations that land Atlantic Mackerel occur during the late fall and winter, when the fish are using sand- and mud-bottom habitats. There is no benthic trawling over the rocky habitats inhabited by Atlantic Mackerel during the spring and summer.

3.50
Points for Habitat Quality and Fishing Gear Impacts

Management

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Select the option that most accurately describes the current management of the fisheries of this species.

1.00
Regulations are ineffective (e.g., illegal fishing or overfishing is occurring) OR the fishery is unregulated (i.e., no control rules are in effect).
2.00
Management measures are in place over a major portion over the species’ range but implementation has not met conservation goals OR management measures are in place but have not been in place long enough to determine if they are likely to achieve conservation and sustainability goals.
3.00
Substantial management measures are in place over a large portion of the species range and have demonstrated success in achieving conservation and sustainability goals.

Atlantic Mackerel were overfished in the 1970s by extensive foreign fishing in U.S. waters. Managers greatly reduced the level of fishing by foreign vessels, and landings decreased from an average of 385,000 metric tons (mt) per year to less than 43,000 mt. As a result, the Atlantic Mackerel population in U.S. waters has recovered from being overfished and is currently at a high level of abundance (MAFMC 2003).

Managers are encouraging the growth of the Atlantic Mackerel fishery, because they consider it to be under-exploited in a climate of increasing global demand for mackerel. In preparation for the fishery's expansion, managers are considering ways to prevent overcapitalization of the fishery (MAFMC 2003).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
There is inadequate scientific monitoring of stock status, catch or fishing effort.

Managers conducted the most recent assessment of the Atlantic Mackerel population in 2000 (NEFSC 2000). They annually monitor population status using trawl survey biomass indices and collect landings data.

Lack of detailed age information has prevented managers from estimating absolute population size, however. A new assessment is due next year, and managers hope it will include the first analytical age-based assessment of Atlantic Mackerel (Seagraves, pers. comm., 11/4/2004).

-0.25
Management does not explicitly address fishery effects on habitat, food webs, and ecosystems.

Predation mortality is the most important component of natural mortality of Atlantic Mackerel. Other finfish, squid, Pilot Whales, Common Dolphins, Harbor Seals, porpoises, Tiger Shark, Blue Shark, and seabirds target Atlantic Mackerel as prey (MAFMC 2003). Fishery managers set catch limits based on calculations that include consideration of natural mortality due to predation. There is no indication that managers are actively addressing the ecosystem impacts of the Atlantic Mackerel fishery, however. (MAFMC 2003).

-0.25
This species is overfished and no recovery plan or an ineffective recovery plan is in place.
-0.25
Management has failed to reduce excess capacity in this fishery or implements subsidies that result in excess capacity in this fishery.
+0.25
There is adequate scientific monitoring, analysis and interpretation of stock status, catch and fishing effort.
+0.25
Management explicitly and effectively addresses fishery effects on habitat, food webs, and ecosystems.
+0.25
This species is overfished and there is a recovery plan (including benchmarks, timetables and methods to evaluate success) in place that is showing signs of success OR recovery plan is not needed.

This species is not overfished (MAFMC 2003), and, therefore, a recovery plan is not needed.

+0.25
Management has taken action to control excess capacity or reduce subsidies that result in excess capacity OR no measures are necessary because fishery is not overcapitalized.

Managers currently classify the Atlantic Mackerel fishery as under-exploited, and their models suggest that the population could withstand greater fishing pressure. The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council is seeking to develop the fishery further, however, it is exploring the use of a controlled access plan to prevent future overcapitalization in the fishery (MAFMC 2003).

3.00
Points for Management

Bycatch

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Select the option that most accurately describes the current level of bycatch and the consequences that result from fishing this species.

The term, "bycatch” used in this document excludes incidental catch of a species for which an adequate management framework exists.

The terms, “endangered, threatened, or protected,” used in this document refer to species status that is determined by national legislation such as the U.S. Endangered Species Act, the U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act (or another nation's equivalent), the IUCN Red List, or a credible scientific body such as the American Fisheries Society.

1.00
Bycatch in this fishery is high (>100% of targeted landings), OR regularly includes a “threatened, endangered or protected species.”

The Atlantic Mackerel fishery is currently listed as a Category I fishery under the Marine Mammal Protection Act's List of Fisheries for 2004, which indicates that it has the highest level of impacts on marine mammals (i.e. mortalities and injuries exceed 50% of the Potential Biological Removal of the species). Atlantic Mackerel fisheries cause mortality and injury to White-sided Dolphins and Common Dolphins, which are protected by the Marine Mammals Protection Act.

From 1977-1991, observers reported 110 Common Dolphin and 42 White-sided Dolphin mortalities in the foreign Atlantic Mackerel fishery operating in the U.S. EEZ (NMFS 2003). Observer coverage was high (e.g. from 1983-1991, coverage was 58-100%) on the foreign vessels, and marine mammal bycatch estimates were, therefore, based on a large body of data. When foreign operations were excluded from the fishery in 1991, observer coverage fell to low levels, less than 1% in some years (NMFS 2003). As a result, current estimates of marine mammal mortality and injury in the Atlantic Mackerel fishery may be inaccurate. The Category I ranking is based upon one mortality of each species in 1997 fishery that was extrapolated to an estimated total of 161 mortalities of each dolphin that year in the Atlantic Mackerel fishery (NMFS 2003).

Clearly, greater observer coverage is needed to accurately assess and address marine mammal bycatch in this fishery.

During 1977-1991, 391 Pilot Whale mortalities were attributed to the Atlantic Mackerel foreign fleet fishery in U.S. waters (MAFMC 2003). Since the exclusion of foreign vessels from the fishery, however, there have been no Pilot Whale mortalities attributed to it (NMFS 2003).

We chose to award one point here because of the Category I classification of the fishery, but we caution that this ranking may change when new estimates based on increased observer coverage in the Atlantic Mackerel are released.

2.00
Bycatch in this fishery is moderate (10-99% of targeted landings) AND does not regularly include “threatened, endangered or protected species” OR level of bycatch is unknown.
3.00
Bycatch in this fishery is low (<10% of targeted landings) and does not regularly include "threatened, endangered or protected species."

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
Bycatch in this fishery is a contributing factor to the decline of “threatened, endangered, or protected species" and no effective measures are being taken to reduce it.

Managers have classified the Common Dolphin population as a strategic population, because the 1996-2000 average annual mortality in all fisheries exceeded Potential Biological Removal (PBR). The estimated mortality of Common Dolphins in the Atlantic Mackerel fishery is greater than 10% of the calculated PBR, which is 227 in the North Atlantic (NFMS 2003).

The Marine Mammal Protection Act mandates that Category I fisheries are required to immediately reduce bycatch of marine mammals. Despite this law, a NMFS Take Reduction Team to reduce bycatch of Common Dolphins and Pilot Whales in the Atlantic Squid, Mackerel, and Butterfish fisheries is not scheduled to convene until the summer of 2006 (MAFMC 2003).

-0.25
Bycatch of targeted or non-targeted species (e.g., undersize individuals) in this fishery is high and no measures are being taken to reduce it.
-0.25
Bycatch of this species (e.g., undersize individuals) in other fisheries is high OR bycatch of this species in other fisheries inhibits its recovery, and no measures are being taken to reduce it.
-0.25
The continued removal of the bycatch species contributes to its decline.
+0.25
Measures taken over a major portion of the species range have been shown to reduce bycatch of “threatened, endangered, or protected species” or bycatch rates are no longer deemed to affect the abundance of the “protected” bycatch species OR no measures needed because fishery is highly selective (e.g., harpoon; spear).
+0.25
There is bycatch of targeted (e.g., undersize individuals) or non-targeted species in this fishery and measures (e.g., gear modifications) have been implemented that have been shown to reduce bycatch over a large portion of the species range OR no measures are needed because fishery is highly selective (e.g., harpoon; spear).
+0.25
Bycatch of this species in other fisheries is low OR bycatch of this species in other fisheries inhibits its recovery, but effective measures are being taken to reduce it over a large portion of the range.

Atlantic Mackerel is captured incidentally and landed in benthic trawl fisheries that target other species. Managers account for these landings when setting catch limits (MAFMC 2003).

+0.25
The continued removal of the bycatch species in the targeted fishery has had or will likely have little or no impact on populations of the bycatch species OR there are no significant bycatch concerns because the fishery is highly selective (e.g., harpoon; spear).

Mid-water trawl fisheries for Atlantic Mackerel also capture River Herring, Dogfish, Silver Hake, Longfin and Shortfin Squid, and Butterfish. The amount of bycatch is small, however, and causes little concern.

1.25
Points for Bycatch

References

Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada (DFO). 2002. Integrated Fisheries Management Plan Atlantic Mackerel 2002-2006.

U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 11/19/2004. Species Fact Sheet: Scomber scombrus. Available at: http://www.fao.org/figis/servlet/org.fao.fi.common.FiRefServlet?ds=species&fid=2473.

Mid-Atlantic Fisheries Management Council. October 2003. 2004 Atlantic Mackerel, Loligo, Illex, and Butterfish Specifications, Draft Environmental Assessment, Regulatory Impact Review, Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, and EFH Assessment.

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2004. List of Fisheries 2004. Available at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/readingrm/Fisheries/2004_final_LOF.pdf.

NMFS. 2003. U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stock Assessments - 2003 Available at: http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/tm/tm182/#ack.

Northeast Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC). 2003. Report of the 22nd Meeting of the NEAFC.

Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC). 2000. 30th Northeast Regional Stock Assessment Workshop.

Seagraves, R. Personal Communication. 11/4/04.

BLUE OCEAN INSTITUTE

34 Muttontown Lane, PO Box 250, East Norwich, NY 11732 • 1-877-BOI-SEAS • seafood@blueocean.org